Tổng quan nghiên cứu vận dụng tư duy thiết kế trong dạy học theo mô hình giáo dục STEAM ở phổ thông
Tóm tắt
Trước xu hướng giáo dục STEAM không ngừng được lan tỏa thế giới, một số giáo viên Việt Nam cũng mong muốn áp dụng mô hình này vào thực tiễn dạy học, nhưng vẫn chưa tìm được quy trình dạy học phù hợp. Bằng phương pháp tổng quan tài liệu, bài báo này khái quát quy trình dạy học theo định hướng giáo dục STEAM qua việc vận dụng tư duy thiết kế. Ngoài ra, nghiên cứu cũng thống kê 6 nhóm kỹ thuật dạy học bổ trợ quy trình dạy học này. Qua đó, bài báo sẽ giúp giáo viên và các nhà giáo dục có thêm một cách tiếp cận mới trong việc dạy học theo định hướng giáo dục STEAM, thúc đẩy việc phát triển năng lực của học sinh Việt Nam.
Tài liệu tham khảo
1. D. Herro and C. Quigley, Exploring teachers’ perceptions of STEAM teaching through professional development: Implications for teacher educators, Professional Development in Education, vol. 43, no. 3, pp. 416-438, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1080/19415257.2016.1205507
2. J. M. Kant, S. R. Burckhard and R. T. Meyers, Engaging high schoo girls in Native American culturally responsive STEAM enrichment activities, Journal of STEM Education, vol. 18, no. 5, pp. 15-25, 2018. Available at: https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1170097
3. S. Haesen and E. Van de Put, STEAM education in Europe: A comparative analysis report, EuroSTEAM, 2018.
4. European Committee of the Regions, Strengthening STE(A)M education in the EU, Opinion Number: CDR 6435/2018, Opinion Factsheet, 2019.
5. J. Siepel, R. Canerani, G. Pellegrino and M. Masucci, The fusion effect: The economic returns to combining arts and science skills: R report Nesta, London: Nesta, 2016.
6. N. A. E. Aziz, Egyptian STEAM international partnerships for sustainable development, International Journal for Cross-Disciplinary Subjects in Education (IJCDSE), vol. 5, no. 4, p. 2656–2660, 2015.
7. S. Shaer, L. Zakzak and E. Shibl, The STEAM dilemma: Advancing sciences in UAE schools – the case of dubai, United Arab Emirates: Mohammed Bin Rashid School of Government (MBRSG), 2019.
8. Prime Minister, Project No. 146/QD-TTg: Raising awareness, popularizing skills and developing national digital transformation human resources by 2025, with orientation to 2030, Ha Noi, 2022.
9. N. V. Hiển, Approaching STEAM teaching in current general education [Tiep can day hoc STEAM trong giao duc pho thong hien nay], Vietnam Journal of Education, vol. 459, no. 1, pp. 1-8, 2019
10. Ministry of Education and Training, Documentary No. 3089 / BGDĐT-GDTrH: Implementation of educational STEM in secondary education [Trien khai thuc hien giao duc STEM trong giao duc trung học], Ha Noi, 2020.
11. Â. T. Ngọc, The actual situation of organizing experiential and career-oriented activities in the direction of STEAM education for high school students in Hanoi [Thuc trang to chuc hoat dong trai nghiem, huong nghiep theo dinh huong giao duc STEAM cho hoc sinh trung hoc pho thong o thanh pho Ha Noi], Vietnam Journal of Education, vol. Speacial volume, no. 2, pp. 217-221, 2020
12. N. T. Nga and T. T. Trung, STEAM education and the applicability of design thinking as an approach to integrate Art-liberal into STEAM education [Giao duc STEAM và tiem nang van dung quy trinh tu duy thiet ke de trien khai giao dục STEAM], Ho Chi Minh City University of Education Journal of Science, vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 310-320, 2021. https://doi.org/10.54607/hcmue.js.18.2.2996(2021)
13. T. T. Trung, T. H. A. Khoa and N. T. Nga, Students' Design Thinking Competency Expressed through Empathetic Problem-solving in STEAM Education [Nang luc tu duy thiet ke cua hoc sinh the hien qua bai hoc chu de STEAM dinh huong giai quyet van de bang su dong cam], TNU Journal of Science and Technology, vol. 228, no. 04, pp. 165-178, 2023. https://doi.org/ 10.34238/tnu-jst.7569
14. G. Melles, . Z. Howard and S. Thompson-Whiteside, Teaching Design Thinking: Expanding Horizons in Design Education, Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, vol. 31, pp. 162-166, 2012. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.12.035
R. Razzoukm and V. Shute, What Is Design Thinking and Why Is It Important?, Review of Educational Research, vol. 82, no. 3, pp. 330-348, 2012. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654312457429
16. D. L. Dunne, R. Martin and J. L. Rotman, Design Thinking and How It Will Change Management Education: An Interview and Discussion, Academy of Management Learning and Education, vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 512-523, 2006. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMLE.2006.23473212
17. M. Sharples, R. Roock, R. Ferguson, M. Gaved, C. Herodotou, E. Koh, A. Kukulska-Hulme, C.-K. Looi, P. McAndrew, B. Rienties, M. Weller and L. H. Wong, Innovating Pedagogy 2016: Open University Innovation Report 5, Milton Keynes: The Open University, 2016.
18. A. D. Watson, Design Thinking for life, Art Education, vol. 68, no. 3, pp. 12-18, 2015. https://doi.org/10.1080/00043125.2015.11519317
19. K. Dorst, The core of ‘design thinking’ and its application, Design Studies, vol. 32, no. 6, pp. 521-532, 2011. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2011.07.006
20. K. D. Elsbach and I. Stigliani, Design Thinking and Organizational Culture: A Review and Framework for Future Research, Journal of Management, vol. 44, no. 6, pp. 2274-2306, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206317744252
21. P. Micheli, S. J. S. Wilner, S. H. Bhatti and M. Mura, Doing Design Thinking: Conceptual Review, Synthesis, and Research Agenda, Journal of Product Innovation Management, vol. 36, no. 2, pp. 1-25, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpim.12466
22. S. Panke, Design Thinking in Education: Perspectives, opportunities, and challenges, Open Education Studies, vol. 1, pp. 281-306, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1515/edu-2019-0022
23. N. M. C. Valentim, W. Silva and T. Conte, The Students' Perspectives on Applying Design Thinking for the Design of Mobile Applications, in Proceeding of the 39th International Conference on Software Engineering: Software Engineering Education and Training Track (ICSE-SEET), 2017.
24. P. Gestwicki and B. J. McNely, A case study of a five-step design thinking process in educational museum game design, Proceedings of Meaningful Play, pp. 2-30, 2012.
25. S. Gopal and T. Clarke, Reimagining Social Change, [Online]. Available: https://www.fsg.org/tools-and-resources/guide-actor-mapping.
26. L. Carlgren, I. Rauth and M. Elmquist, Framing Design Thinking: The Concept in Idea and Enactment, Creativity and Innovation Management, vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 38-57, 2016.
27. R. Peterson-Veatch, School Reform Initiative, 2017. [Online]. Available: https://www.schoolreforminitiative.org/download/affinity-mapping/.
28. M. Eppler and S. Kernbach, Dynagrams: Enhancing Design Thinking Through Dynamic Diagrams, in Design Thinking for Innovation: Research and Practice, W. Brenner and F. Uebernickel, Eds., Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2016, pp. 85-102.
29. T. T. Trung, Organized to teach some knowledge of the chapter “Eyes. Optical instruments - Physics 11 according to the STEAM educational model [To chuc day hoc mot so kien thuc chuong “Mat. Cac dung cu quang hoc” - Vat li 11 theo dinh huong giao duc STEAM], Graduation thesis. Ho Chi Minh city: Ho Chi Minh city University of Education, 2020
30. M. Camacho, An Integrative Model of Design Thinking, in The 21st DMI: Academic Design Management Conference Next Wave, London, Ravensbourne, United Kingdom, 2018.
31. T. Harth and S. Panke, Creating Effective Physical Learning Spaces in the Digital Age – Results of a Student-Centered Design Thinking Workshop, in Proceedings of E-Learn: World Conference on E-Learning in Corporate, Government, Healthcare, and Higher Education, New Orleans, Louisiana, United States, 2019.
32. D. Henriksen, Creating STEAM with Design Thinking: Beyond STEM and Arts Integration, The STEAM Journal, vol. 3, no. 1, Article 11, 2017. Available at: http://scholarship.claremont.edu/steam/vol3/iss1/11
33. T. Brown and J. Wyatt, Design thinking for social innovation, Development Outreach, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 29-43, 2010. https://doi.org/10.1596/1020-797X_12_1_29
34. B. Jonson, Design ideation: the conceptual sketch in the digital age, Design studies, vol. 26, no. 6, pp. 613-624, 2005. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2005.03.001
35. T. Brown and B. Katz, Change by design: how design thinking transforms organizations and inspires innovation, vol. 20091, New York: HarperBusiness, 2019.
36. M. Lande and L. Leifer, Prototyping to learn: Characterizing engineering students’ prototyping activities and prototypes, in DS 58-1: Proceedings of ICED 09, the 17th International Conference on Engineering Design, Vol. 1, Design Processes, Palo Alto, CA, USA, 24.-27.08.2009, 2009.
Tải xuống
Đã Xuất bản
Cách trích dẫn
Số
Chuyên mục
Giấy phép
Tác phẩm này được cấp phép theo Giấy phép quốc tế Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 .
